Among free men there is competition as to who will do most, each for the common good, each by himself, all expecting to share in the misfortunes of defeat, or in the benefits of victory; but an enslaved people loses in addition to this warlike courage, all signs of enthusiasm, for their hearts are degraded, submissive, and incapable of any great deedÉtienne de La Boétie - The Politics of Obedience 1552-1553
Sunday, January 31, 2010
Economics of Liberty
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Liberty and King's Favor
"By such words, Hydarnes, you give us no good counsel," replied the Lacedaemonians, "because you have experienced merely the advantage of which you speak; you do not know the privilege we enjoy. You have the honor of the king's favor; but you know nothing about liberty, what relish it has and how sweet it is. For if you had any knowledge of it, you yourself would advise us to defend it, not with lance and shield, but with our very teeth and nails."Étienne de La Boétie - The Politics of Obedience 1552-1553
Friday, January 29, 2010
Liberty is the Natural Condition
Liberty is the natural condition of the people. Servitude, however, is fostered when people are raised in subjection. People are trained to adore rulers. While freedom is forgotten by many there are always some who will never submit.Étienne de La Boétie - The Politics of Obedience 1552-1553
Labels:
1500's,
Definitions,
Étienne de La Boétie,
Liberty,
Nature of Man
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Rothbard on Boétie
Why in the world do people consent to their own enslavement?Murray Rothbard in his Introduction to The Politics of Obedience by Étienne de La Boétie, 1975
Wednesday, January 27, 2010
Indifference vs Cowardice
But if a hundred, if a thousand endure the caprice of a single man, should we not rather say that they lack not the courage but the desire to rise against him, and that such an attitude indicates indifference rather than cowardice?Étienne de La Boétie - The Politics of Obedience 1552-1553
Tuesday, January 26, 2010
Debt Solution
How can the solution for debt and consumption be more debt and more consumption? How can that be the solution to our problems?Jim Rogers
Labels:
1980-Present,
Economics,
Investment Gurus,
Money,
USA Collapse
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)